Gender permeates all development issues, and there is growing debate surrounding how best to implement and promote gender balance and equality throughout the development agenda.
This episode broadly focuses on two different views of why we might be interested in women in development: the first based on instrumental reasons (what can women and girls do for development) and the second on more structural and contextual reasons (what development can do for women and girls).
Our guests are Andrea Cornwall of the Institute of Development Studies and Prue Clarke of New Narratives.
Andrea Cornwall talks of ’empowerment-lite’: the view that small-scale interventions often provide a palliative without addressing the structural causes of inequitable power relations; that they often tackle symptoms but not underlying causes of power imbalance. She argues that a focus on ‘results’ tends to emphasize instrumental interventions and does not give
enough priority to interventions which help bring about changes in power dynamics.
Prue draws on her experience in working with women journalists in Africa to give examples of how the right small-scale instrumental interventions can change the political context and tackle causes of imbalance, focusing on stories that relate to women and children such as high teen pregnancy, unsafe abortion and female genital cutting.
Running time 1 hour and 1 minute; size 39.9 Mb
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Would love to see a discussion between these women and Esther Duflo or other J-PALer.
Thanks for a great podcast to Owen and Prue and Andrea. I had some thoughts about the pros and cons of arguing for one-shot solutions vs changes in context, which I explore here:
http://desibility.org/2012/10/if-you-had-one-shot/
It would have been nice to hear more about the potential difficulties with changing context!
Pingback: Gender, Frauen, Mädchen, Entwicklung, Afrika
Pingback: Want to do Something Good for Development, Mr Cameron? Cut the aid budget | Development Dissident